. Do you agree with the overall objectives of enabling Private IMT Networks in the UAE?
Do you foresee strong demand for private IMT networks across your sector, and are there any additional national priorities or use cases that should be explicitly addressed?
Do you agree with the proposed definition of Private IMT Networks, including the limitation to internal operational use and restricted access to authorized users?
Should the Framework allow limited access to enterprises (including government entities) and third parties (e.g., contractors or partners)?
Do you agree with the classification of deployment architectures into Standalone (fully isolated) networks and Integrated networks?
What additional safeguards should apply to integrated architectures?
Are the distinctions between private and public networks sufficiently clear?
Do you agree with allowing enterprises (including government) to directly deploy and operate private networks?
Are enterprises (including government) capable of meeting regulatory and technical obligations?
Do you agree with the proposed principles for spectrum assignment and use?
Do you agree with the proposed three-tier allocation within Band n77 (200 MHz Operator / 100 MHz Enterprise / 100 MHz Reserved)?
Do you agree that 20 MHz blocks for operators and 10 MHz blocks for enterprises (including government entities) represent appropriate minimum assignable units?
Is the 100 MHz strategic reserve appropriately sized to support future use cases, or should the size of the reserve be reconsidered?
Do you agree with the proposed three-tier allocation of the 24.25–25.5 GHz mmWave band (600 MHz Operator / 400 MHz Enterprise / 250 MHz Reserved)?
Do you agree with structuring the Operator Tier to accommodate up to two operator allocations of 300 MHz each (3 × 100 MHz blocks), assigned on a first-come, first-served basis?
Do you agree that 100 MHz blocks for operators and 50 MHz blocks for enterprises represent appropriate minimum assignable units for mmWave deployments?
Is the 250 MHz strategic reserve appropriately sized to support future use cases (e.g., 5G-Advanced, 6G), or should the size of the reserve be reconsidered?
What are your expected use cases for mmWave private networks, and which tier (operator-led or enterprise-led) best suits your operational requirements?
Do you agree with the proposed technical parameters for the 3.8–4.2 GHz mid-band, including the maximum EIRP limit and supported channel bandwidths?
Do you agree that the proposed parameters are consistent with available 5G NR Band n77 equipment, or should additional parameters be considered?
Do you agree with the proposed technical parameters for the 24.25–25.5 GHz mmWave band, including the maximum EIRP limit and supported channel bandwidths?
Do you agree with the proposed approach to protecting adjacent EESS earth stations through out-of-band emission limits, or should additional protection measures be defined?
Do you agree that downlink-favored or other alternative frame structures should be permitted only subject to a coexistence study and demonstrated operational need? Which uplink-intensive use cases in your sector should the default support, and what DL:UL ratio would best serve them?
Do you agree with adopting an uplink-favored frame structure (DSUUU, approximately 1:3 DL:UL) as the default for Private IMT deployments in both the 3.8–4.2 GHz and 24.25–25.5 GHz bands, reflecting the uplink-dominant nature of private-network traffic?
Do you consider the proposed TDRA regulatory control mechanisms sufficient to ensure efficient spectrum management and protection of incumbent services?
Do you agree with the use of non-binding spectrum allocation ranges, or should minimum and/or maximum spectrum caps be defined?
Do you agree with a cost-recovery pricing approach, and which pricing model do you prefer (flat fee or formula-based)? Additionally, which factors should determine pricing (e.g., bandwidth, area, use case, frequency band)?
Should incentives or reduced fees be offered for private IMT networks?
Do you consider the proposed monitoring and compliance mechanisms sufficient, or should real-time/automated monitoring be introduced, and what enforcement measures should apply in cases of non-compliance?
Do you agree with the proposed identification approach for private networks (e.g., single PLMN ID per MNO, enterprise use of PLMN/MNC), and are there any limitations?
Do you agree with restricting the use of public numbering resources, and in which use cases would numbering be required?
What regulatory changes would accelerate adoption?
What spectrum bands should be considered in the future?
What security or compliance obligations should be imposed?